First Page | Document Content | |
---|---|---|
![]() Date: 2008-06-24 00:22:45Apprendi v. New Jersey Stephen Breyer Antonin Scalia John Roberts Jury David Souter Cunningham v. California Blakely v. Washington Supreme Court of the United States United States federal courts Law | Add to Reading List |
![]() | Microsoft Word - Responses_Blakely v Washington.docDocID: 1uTN7 - View Document |
![]() | RETHINKING PARENTAL INCARCERATION SARAH ABRAMOWICZ * Recent changes in sentencing law, in the wake of cases interpreting Blakely v. Washington and United States v. Booker, have raised the possibility that courts sentenciDocID: 1u8YR - View Document |
![]() | DEMOGRAPHIC IMPACT STATEMENTS, O’CONNOR’S WARNING, AND THE MYSTERIES OF PRISON RELEASE: TOPICS FROM A SENTENCING REFORM AGENDA Kevin R. Reitz∗ I.DocID: 1aJGU - View Document |
![]() | PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ No_____________DocID: 19veD - View Document |
![]() | The Feeney Pit and the Pendulum: Swings in Criminalizing Securities LawsDocID: 141Ic - View Document |