San Francisco / ROSWELL / Ros-well / Milton / City / Arlington / /
Company
MetroPCS Inc. / State Farm / Carlo Bianchi & Co. / Pacific Saipan Ltd. / Arkansas-Best Freight System Inc. / United States Inc. / L. & W. R. Co. / Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation / Chenery Corp. / T-MOBILE SOUTH LLC / Florida Power & Light Co. / the Star / AT&T Wireless PCS Inc. / Compare Southwestern Bell Mobile Systems Inc. / Burlington Truck Lines Inc. / LTV Corp. / /
Country
United States / /
Facility
Federal District Court / B. Garner / /
IndustryTerm
law principles / reasons when they deny applications / equivalent services / wireless communications facilities / wireless service / communications laws / personal wireless service facilities / telecommunications facilities / telecommunications / cell phone tower siting applications / Internet Materials / that localities shall act on applications / /
Organization
Federal Aviation Administration / United States Supreme Court / national bureaucratic army / District Court / Planning and Zoning Division / U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission / City Council / Congress / Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America / Federal Communications Commission / UN Court / Roswell Mayor and City Council / US Federal Reserve / National Assn / City's Planning and Zoning Division / Federal District Court / City Council of Virginia Beach / /
Person
Wynn / Ginsburg / Betsy Branch / Clinton / Sue Creel / Igleheart / Price / Dippolito / / /
Position
Chief Justice / Solicitor General / court reporter / Clerk / Secretary / city clerk / /
ProgrammingLanguage
A sharp / /
ProvinceOrState
Kansas / San Francisco / Virginia / Mississippi / Georgia / /
Technology
wireless communications / cellular telephone / radio frequency / /
T-MOBILE SOUTH, LLC, PETITIONER v. CITY OF ROSWELL, GEORGIA NoUnited States Supreme Court January 14, 2015