Ashcroft v. American Civil Liberties Union

Results: 53



#Item
1IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION, et al. : :

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION, et al. : :

Add to Reading List

Source URL: www.paed.uscourts.gov

Language: English - Date: 2007-03-22 08:13:22
2A N ATION W IDE P U BLIC IN TER EST R ELIGIOU S C IVIL L IBERTIES L AW F IR M 1055 Maitland Center Cm ns. Second Floor Maitland, FloridaTel: 800•671•1776 Fax: 407•875•0770

A N ATION W IDE P U BLIC IN TER EST R ELIGIOU S C IVIL L IBERTIES L AW F IR M 1055 Maitland Center Cm ns. Second Floor Maitland, FloridaTel: 800•671•1776 Fax: 407•875•0770

Add to Reading List

Source URL: lc.org

Language: English - Date: 2016-07-15 17:42:57
3MONTANA STATE OBSCENITY & LIBRARY/SCHOOL FILTERING STATUTES (Last Updated SummerMont. Code Anno. § Obscenity.

MONTANA STATE OBSCENITY & LIBRARY/SCHOOL FILTERING STATUTES (Last Updated SummerMont. Code Anno. § Obscenity.

Add to Reading List

Source URL: 3m37tq2euojp3d9gpf4dbqph.wpengine.netdna-cdn.com

Language: English - Date: 2016-01-25 11:12:58
4A N ATION W IDE P U BLIC IN TER EST R ELIGIOU S C IVIL L IBERTIES L AW F IR M 1055 Maitland Center Cm ns. Second Floor Maitland, FloridaTel: 800•671•1776 Fax: 407•875•0770

A N ATION W IDE P U BLIC IN TER EST R ELIGIOU S C IVIL L IBERTIES L AW F IR M 1055 Maitland Center Cm ns. Second Floor Maitland, FloridaTel: 800•671•1776 Fax: 407•875•0770

Add to Reading List

Source URL: www.lc.org

Language: English - Date: 2015-07-06 15:01:47
5November 16, 2010 Law Professors’Letter in Opposition to SCombating Online Infringements and Counterfeits Act) The Senate Judiciary Committee is poised to consider a bill that, if enacted, will have dangerous c

November 16, 2010 Law Professors’Letter in Opposition to SCombating Online Infringements and Counterfeits Act) The Senate Judiciary Committee is poised to consider a bill that, if enacted, will have dangerous c

Add to Reading List

Source URL: www.temple.edu

Language: English - Date: 2010-11-17 14:28:50
6UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT ________________ August Term, Argued: November 2, 2005

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT ________________ August Term, Argued: November 2, 2005

Add to Reading List

Source URL: w2.eff.org

Language: English - Date: 2006-09-07 17:27:03
7DRAFT[removed]Why Filters are Not the Answer1 In 1998, Congress passed the Child Online Protection Act (COPA), which required age verification screens for websites containing material ―harmful to minors. COPA was an

DRAFT[removed]Why Filters are Not the Answer1 In 1998, Congress passed the Child Online Protection Act (COPA), which required age verification screens for websites containing material ―harmful to minors. COPA was an

Add to Reading List

Source URL: www.cp80.org

Language: English - Date: 2007-08-13 14:15:09
8DRAFT[removed]A National Standard and the Internet1 The government‟s attempts to regulate obscenity on the Internet have led legal commentators to question the applicability of Miller’s local community standard to t

DRAFT[removed]A National Standard and the Internet1 The government‟s attempts to regulate obscenity on the Internet have led legal commentators to question the applicability of Miller’s local community standard to t

Add to Reading List

Source URL: www.cp80.org

Language: English - Date: 2007-08-13 14:09:44
9DRAFT[removed]Miller’s Community Standard and the Internet1 The definition of “obscene” set forth in Miller v. California,2 which relies on a “contemporary community standard,” has never been particularly wor

DRAFT[removed]Miller’s Community Standard and the Internet1 The definition of “obscene” set forth in Miller v. California,2 which relies on a “contemporary community standard,” has never been particularly wor

Add to Reading List

Source URL: www.cp80.org

Language: English - Date: 2007-08-13 14:10:38
10DRAFT[removed]The Government’s Interest in Protecting Minors1 Local, state and federal governments have consistently asserted a compelling interest in protecting the well-being of minors.2 Case law, statutes, findings

DRAFT[removed]The Government’s Interest in Protecting Minors1 Local, state and federal governments have consistently asserted a compelling interest in protecting the well-being of minors.2 Case law, statutes, findings

Add to Reading List

Source URL: www.cp80.org

Language: English - Date: 2007-08-13 14:11:43