Back to Results
First PageMeta Content
Law enforcement in the United States / Terry v. Ohio / Reasonable suspicion / Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution / United States v. Brignoni-Ponce / Whren v. United States / Suspicion / Berkemer v. McCarty / Traffic stop / Law / Searches and seizures / Criminal law


[Cite as State v. Mays, 119 Ohio St.3d 406, 2008-Ohio[removed]THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. MAYS, APPELLANT. [Cite as State v. Mays, 119 Ohio St.3d 406, 2008-Ohio[removed]Traffic stops – Constitutional standards – O
Add to Reading List

Document Date: 2008-11-03 08:28:24


Open Document

File Size: 42,51 KB

Share Result on Facebook

City

Newark / /

Company

Common sense / /

Country

United States / /

Event

Judicial Event / /

Facility

Court of Appeals / /

IndustryTerm

particular law enforcement practice / traffic law / lane give law enforcement carte blanche opportunity / /

Organization

SUPREME COURT OF OHIO / United States Supreme Court / Court of Appeals / UN Court / Hodge court / /

Person

Christopher Mays / Logan App / ANTHONY O. CALABRESE JR. / Tricia M. Moore / Robert E. Calesaric / McCarty / /

Position

police officer / driver / Assistant Newark Director / law-enforcement officer / Officer / lawenforcement officer / /

Product

Patrol / /

ProvinceOrState

Eighth Appellate District / Ohio / Delaware / Licking County / Fifth District / /

SocialTag