<--- Back to Details
First PageDocument Content
Knowledge / Peer review / Technical communication / Open access / National Institutes of Health / American Chemical Society / American Institute of Biological Sciences / Federal Research Public Access Act / Scientific journal / Academia / Academic publishing / Publishing
Date: 2010-12-15 09:05:56
Knowledge
Peer review
Technical communication
Open access
National Institutes of Health
American Chemical Society
American Institute of Biological Sciences
Federal Research Public Access Act
Scientific journal
Academia
Academic publishing
Publishing

Microsoft Word - AAPDCPrinciplesOpposingHouseFRPAAFINAL

Add to Reading List

Source URL: www.dcprinciples.org

Download Document from Source Website

File Size: 87,79 KB

Share Document on Facebook

Similar Documents

Statement of Peer review In submitting conference proceedings to Web of Conferences, the editors of the proceedings certify to the Publisher that 1. They adhere to its Policy on Publishing Integrity in order to safeguard

DocID: 1vpo4 - View Document

Sosiologisk årbokAnonym kritikk: Peer Review∗ satt på prøve av vitenskaps-teori og forskning1 Gerhard Fröhlich

DocID: 1vn4A - View Document

Drug Ratings: DOCTORS SAY PEER RATINGS CHANGE THEIR PERCEPTION OF DRUGS In May 2017, the leading global social network for doctors launched SERMO Drug Ratings – the first and only global peer-to-peer drug review system

DocID: 1vjj3 - View Document

Office of Human Rights Peer-to-Peer Reportable IncidentsAs you have heard the Office of Human Rights is conducting a retrospective review of closed ID/DD abuse/neglect investigations from state fiscal year 201

DocID: 1vipZ - View Document

3a. Peer review instructions Eng Dec 2017

DocID: 1vgkw - View Document