Guidance on treatment of errors-final version.doc

First Page		Document Content
Date: 2011-12-13 10:02:37 Error Audit Materiality Systematic error Sampling Information technology audit process Statistics Measurement Sampling error		Guidance on treatment of errors-final version.doc Add to Reading List Source URL: www.oerok.gv.at Download Document from Source Website File Size: 80,53 KB Share Document on Facebook

	Topline Results Survey of Voters on Abortion Fielded January 20 to January 27, 2016 N = 1,060 registered voters 18 and older Margin of sampling error = + 3.7 percentage points February 29, 2016 DocID: 1tzHw - View Document
	Interviews with 1,160 adult Americans conducted by telephone by Opinion Research Corporation on December 16-20, 2009. The margin of sampling error for results based on the total sample is plus or minus 3 percentage point DocID: 1tpgt - View Document
	Interview dates: September 17, 2010 – October 7, 2010 Interviews: 1,254 adults; 571 Democrats; 457 Republicans Sampling margin of error for a 50% statistic with 95% confidence is: ±4.4 for all adults; ±6.5 for Democr DocID: 1tofS - View Document
	Florida Interviews with 1,003 adult Floridians conducted by telephone by ORC International on September 7-12, 2016. The margin of sampling error for results based on the total sample is plus or minus 3 percentage points. DocID: 1tnov - View Document
	Florida Interviews with 1,011 adult Floridians conducted by telephone by ORC International on October 27 – November 1, 2016. The margin of sampling error for results based on the total sample is plus or minus 3 percent DocID: 1tlbq - View Document