Back to Results
First PageMeta Content
Search engine indexing / Precision and recall / Full text search / Document clustering / Web query classification / Rocchio Classification / Information science / Information retrieval / Document retrieval


Dynamic Taxonomy Composition via Keyqueries Tim Gollub Michael Völske Matthias Hagen
Add to Reading List

Document Date: 2014-09-04 04:23:03


Open Document

File Size: 491,71 KB

Share Result on Facebook

City

Dublin / San Francisco / Harlow / Barcelona / Montréal / Weimar / Information Retrieval / Hyderabad / New York / Using Wikipedia / Query / Washington / DC / Zurich / Berlin / Atlanta / Data Mining / Copenhagen / Toronto / Glasgow / /

Company

Cambridge University Press / Pearson Education Ltd. / Springer-Verlag New York Inc. / Libraries Unlimited Inc. / /

Country

Germany / Switzerland / United States / Canada / United Kingdom / Spain / India / Ireland / Denmark / /

Currency

USD / /

Event

Product Issues / Product Recall / /

Facility

Library of Congress Classification / /

IndustryTerm

greedy set-cover algorithm / search result sets / post-processing step / search experience / query-based search engine / library classification systems / Web Clustering Engines / search box / conventional query-based search engine / Subject-oriented classification systems / batch processing / online taxonomy composition process / online process / Slow search / multi-branch hierarchical clustering algorithm / search strategy / distributed processing techniques / e-discovery / daily web search experience / hierarchical clustering algorithm / pruned search space / serendipity search / conventional classification systems / search result size / search behavior / respective search results / hierarchical classification systems / online library tool / library management / online part / decent query-based search engines / Web Search Results / exploratory search setting / online processing times / search result list / query-based search engines / set cover algorithm / search engines / document cover algorithm / approximate solution / classification systems / established library tools / dynamic classification systems / search engine theory / search interfaces / slow search problem / online component / offline processing / employed search engine takes / heuristic search space pruning / static classification systems / serendipity search setting / search space / search engine / dynamic and human-made classification systems / search results / middle-ground solutions / document recommender systems / search scenarios / cluster algorithm / longer search session / /

Organization

Organization of Information / Cambridge University / Assoc. for Computational Linguistics / Idf / Canadian Society for Computational Studies / Congress / Digital Library Federation / Keyqueries Tim Gollub Michael Völske Matthias Hagen Benno Stein Bauhaus-Universität Weimar / /

Person

Arlene Taylor / Tim Gollub Michael Völske Matthias / Min Median / Min Median Max Static Max / Michael Völske Matthias Hagen Benno / Matthias Hagen Benno Stein Bauhaus-Universität / David Weinberger / Max Static / Henry Holt / /

Position

Query Formulation General / /

Product

Apache / curves / /

ProgrammingLanguage

DC / /

ProvinceOrState

Quebec / New York / Ontario / /

PublishedMedium

Computational Linguistics / Machine Learning / Communications of the ACM / /

Technology

covering algorithm / RAM / greedy set-cover algorithm / ESA / search engine / machine learning / Intelligent Agent Technologies / cluster algorithm / hierarchical clustering algorithm / Knowledge Management / set cover algorithm / Approximation Algorithms / Data Mining / caching / Apriori algorithm / document cover algorithm / multi-branch hierarchical clustering algorithm / /

URL

http /

SocialTag