<--- Back to Details
First PageDocument Content
Academic publishing / Academic literature / Scientific method / Technical communication / Peer review / Scientific misconduct / Retraction / Scientific literature / Nature / Knowledge / Publishing / Science
Date: 2014-08-25 14:11:59
Academic publishing
Academic literature
Scientific method
Technical communication
Peer review
Scientific misconduct
Retraction
Scientific literature
Nature
Knowledge
Publishing
Science

CSE_37_02-Spring-2014.indd

Add to Reading List

Source URL: www.councilscienceeditors.org

Download Document from Source Website

File Size: 74,54 KB

Share Document on Facebook

Similar Documents

Retraction Notice. Retraction notice to: Clinical Importance of Evaluation of Iron Profile Parameters in Hypothyroid Patients Neeraj Singla1, Heena Singla2* 1MBBS,

DocID: 1uon0 - View Document

RETRACTION GUIDELINES Summary Journal editors should consider retracting a publication if: • they have clear evidence that the findings are unreliable, either as a result of misconduct (e.g. data fabrication) or hone

DocID: 1ukAf - View Document

J Parasit Dis (Apr-June):329 https://doi.orgs12639z RETRACTION NOTE Retraction Note to: Therapeutic management of trypanosomosis

DocID: 1ujly - View Document

Gradual Type Precision as Retraction Max S. New Northeastern University POPL 2017 Student Research Competition Extended Abstract

DocID: 1tNOr - View Document

Journal of Psychoceramics http://dx.doi.org24242424x Retraction: Toward a Unified Theory of HighEnergy Metaphysics: Silly String Theory Josiah Carberry

DocID: 1tmO1 - View Document