Microsoft Word[removed]!.DOC

First Page		Document Content
Date: 2011-09-27 19:56:25 Forensic evidence Biology DNA profiling Molecular biology Circumstantial evidence Forensic science Fingerprint Real evidence Texas Court of Criminal Appeals Evidence law Law Biometrics		Microsoft Word[removed]!.DOC Add to Reading List Source URL: www.fordarlieroutier.org Download Document from Source Website File Size: 127,31 KB Share Document on Facebook

	The P RO S E C U T O R Context and Consequences: DNA Testing Guidelines for Prosecutors T E D RO B E RT HUNT DocID: 19fST - View Document
	MBINGA NYAMBEvTHE PEOPLESUPREME COURTSAKALA C.J., CHIBESAKUNDA, AND CHIBOMBA, JJS.,10th AUGUST, 2011(S.C.Z. Judgment No. 5 of] Criminal law and procedure - Evidence - Circumstantial evidence -Weakness or danger DocID: 18aOf - View Document
	Index Relevance Definition (s 55). If irrelevant, inadmissible (s 56). Direct vs Circumstantial evidence (e.g. Smith v R; Plomp; Shepherd). Can also exclude using ss 135-7. DocID: 180U6 - View Document
	RELEVANCE Evidence must be directly or indirectly relevant to a fact in issue (Wilson / Smith) Circumstantial evidence may be relevant (Plomp v R / Shepherd v R) s55: Relevant evidence (Wilson / Smith) The evidence that DocID: 17zlJ - View Document
	HENRIK SKOV NIELSEN: STEEN STEENSEN BLICHER WITH A SPECIAL VIEW TO ”THE PARSON AT VEJLBYE” ¡  Prove by circumstantial evidence, but “beyond reasonable doubt” DocID: 172Rp - View Document