Supreme Court Justices’ Recusal Decisions Should be Transparent and Reviewable It is a basic precept that no one should be a judge in his or her own case. Yet this is exactly what Supreme Court justices are allowed to - Nevada Commission on Ethics v. Carrigan - Document - PDFSEARCH.IO

First Page	Meta Content
	Supreme Court Justices’ Recusal Decisions Should be Transparent and Reviewable It is a basic precept that no one should be a judge in his or her own case. Yet this is exactly what Supreme Court justices are allowed to Add to Reading List Document Date: 2013-10-15 13:41:50 Open Document File Size: 159,54 KB Share Result on Facebook Company Koch Industries / A.T. Massey Coal / / IndustryTerm federal law / campaign finance laws / recusal law / / Organization Congress / William S. Boyd School of Law / Supreme Court / / Person Jeffrey Stempel / Dick Cheney / Thomas / Murphy / Scalia / Rehnquist / / Position Representative / government lawyer / usher / Vice-President / judge / state court judge / Professor / / SocialTag Antonin Scalia Supreme Court of the United States Supreme Court of Pakistan Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Co. Nevada Commission on Ethics v. Carrigan Law Judicial disqualification Legal procedure

Supreme Court Justices’ Recusal Decisions Should be Transparent and Reviewable It is a basic precept that no one should be a judge in his or her own case. Yet this is exactly what Supreme Court justices are allowed to Add to Reading List