logical verificationexercises 2 Exercise 1. This exercise is concerned with dependent types. We use the following definition in Coq: Inductive natlist_dep : nat -> Set := | nil_dep : natlist_dep 0 - Logical syntax - Document - PDFSEARCH.IO

First Page		Document Content
Date: 2011-09-02 08:06:23 Logic Mathematical logic Mathematics Type theory Propositional calculus Syntax Predicate logic CurryHoward correspondence Dependent type Lambda calculus First-order logic Proposition		logical verificationexercises 2 Exercise 1. This exercise is concerned with dependent types. We use the following definition in Coq: Inductive natlist_dep : nat -> Set := \| nil_dep : natlist_dep 0 Add to Reading List Source URL: www.cs.ru.nl Download Document from Source Website File Size: 62,96 KB Share Document on Facebook

	ON ANALYTICITY IN DEEP INFERENCE PAOLA BRUSCOLI AND ALESSIO GUGLIELMI In this note, we discuss the notion of analytic inference rule for propositional logics in the calculus of structures (CoSCoS generalises the s DocID: 1t0LY - View Document
	Steve Warner Curriculum Vitae Department of Mathematics Hofstra University Hempstead, NY 11549 DocID: 1rjw8 - View Document
	Uniform interpolation and sequent calculi in modal logic Rosalie Iemhoff∗ March 28, 2015 Abstract DocID: 1ripK - View Document
	179 Doc. Math. J. DMV Differen e S heme for the Vlasov-Manev System DocID: 1rgQa - View Document
	Consequence relations and admissible rules Rosalie Iemhoff∗ Department of Philosophy Utrecht University, The Netherlands June 10, 2016 DocID: 1rfeR - View Document