Do Not Delete[removed]:02 PM ADDRESS THE RELEVANCE OF OFFENDER

First Page		Document Content
Date: 2014-04-25 19:34:46 United States Federal Sentencing Guidelines United States federal law United States v. Booker Kimbrough v. United States Blakely v. Washington Marvin E. Frankel Gall v. United States Mandatory sentencing United States Sentencing Commission United States criminal procedure Law Criminal procedure		Do Not Delete[removed]:02 PM ADDRESS THE RELEVANCE OF OFFENDER Add to Reading List Source URL: www.houstonlawreview.org Download Document from Source Website File Size: 206,39 KB Share Document on Facebook

	RETHINKING PARENTAL INCARCERATION SARAH ABRAMOWICZ * Recent changes in sentencing law, in the wake of cases interpreting Blakely v. Washington and United States v. Booker, have raised the possibility that courts sentenci DocID: 1u8YR - View Document
	Case: Document: Page: 1 DocID: 1pL6K - View Document
	JanuarySentencing Guidelines Frequently Asked Questions & Answers Q. It appears criminal history scores will be reduced under the new guidelines. Why? A. The presenting offense is arguably as important as the DocID: 1os0A - View Document
	Microsoft Word - FS Brief History of Crack LawsNW DocID: 1my60 - View Document
	FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit April 30, 2009 PUBLISH DocID: 1ll9b - View Document