6.DECLUE.MACRO[removed]DO NOT DELETE[removed]:25 PM SUGARCOATING THE EIGHTH AMENDMENT: THE GROSSLY

First Page		Document Content
Date: 2012-09-13 13:44:05 Harmelin v. Michigan Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution Ewing v. California Lockyer v. Andrade Coker v. Georgia Solem v. Helm Weems v. United States Furman v. Georgia United States Constitution Law Case law United States		6.DECLUE.MACRO[removed]DO NOT DELETE[removed]:25 PM SUGARCOATING THE EIGHTH AMENDMENT: THE GROSSLY Add to Reading List Source URL: www.swlaw.edu Download Document from Source Website File Size: 448,25 KB Share Document on Facebook

	WhyMustPunishmentbeCruelandUnusual DocID: 1jA8n - View Document
	Sentencing Advisory Council Level 4, 436 Lonsdale Street Melbourne VIC 3000 Email: [removed] 27 July 2009 DocID: XlTq - View Document
	[J[removed]IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT CASTILLE, C.J., SAYLOR, EAKIN, BAER, TODD, MCCAFFERY, ORIE MELVIN, JJ. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Appellee DocID: S2NP - View Document
	IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 101,213 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. ALEJANDRO GOMEZ, DocID: RNLU - View Document
	Microsoft Word[removed]Juvenile Criminal ResponsibilityR20110815.docx DocID: Ru6T - View Document