Case: [removed]Document: [removed]Page: 1

First Page		Document Content
Date: 2013-10-21 16:39:58 Grutter v. Bollinger Equal Protection Clause Amicus curiae Gratz v. Bollinger Regents of the University of California v. Bakke City of Richmond v. J.A. Croson Co. Cato Institute Narrow tailoring Meredith v. Jefferson County Board of Education Law Case law Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1		Case: [removed]Document: [removed]Page: 1 Add to Reading List Source URL: www.utexas.edu Download Document from Source Website File Size: 264,59 KB Share Document on Facebook

	NoIn The Supreme Court of the United States ____________ DocID: 1rp4y - View Document
	November 19, 2015 U. S. Commission on Civil Rights Issues Statement in Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin Supporting the University’s Admissions Policy as a Compelling Governmental Interest and Narrowly Tailored DocID: 1qJcv - View Document
	July 20, 2016 The U.S. Commission on Civil Rights Applauds the U.S. Supreme Court’s Recent Decision Upholding the University of Texas’ Affirmative Action Admissions Policy The U.S. Commission on Civil Rights applauds DocID: 1qCAA - View Document
	Was Justice O’Connor Right? Race and Highly Selective College Admissions in 25 Years1 Alan B. Krueger, Jesse Rothstein, and Sarah Turner In her opinion in Grutter v. Bollinger, Justice Sandra Day O’Connor concluded t DocID: 1qrjI - View Document
	Microsoft Word - 5222287_7.DOCX DocID: 1qcyc - View Document