<--- Back to Details
First PageDocument Content
Mitigating factor / Strickland v. Washington / Insanity defense / Mitigating evidence / Bigby v. Dretke / Walton v. Arizona / Law / Juries / Government
Date: 2010-01-21 15:26:14
Mitigating factor
Strickland v. Washington
Insanity defense
Mitigating evidence
Bigby v. Dretke
Walton v. Arizona
Law
Juries
Government

[removed]Smith v. Spisak[removed])

Add to Reading List

Source URL: www.supremecourt.gov

Download Document from Source Website

File Size: 198,05 KB

Share Document on Facebook

Similar Documents

Singapore, 6th of July 2017 Jury corps for IYPT 2017  Experienced jurors who have already been in IYPT juries in the previous years

DocID: 1ukWu - View Document

Trial by Machine ANDREA ROTH* This Article explores the rise of “machines” in criminal adjudication. Human witnesses now often give way to gadgets and interpretive software, juries’ complex judgments about moral bl

DocID: 1sULo - View Document

Portfolio Media. Inc. | 111 West 19th Street, 5th Floor | New York, NY 10011 | www.law360.com Phone: + | Fax: + | Halo Gives Juries Bigger Role On Enhanced Patent Da

DocID: 1sIIg - View Document

2006 UCLA J.L. & Tech. 3 JUDGING JURIES: EVALUATING RENEWED PROPOSALS FOR SPECIALIZED JURIES FROM A PUBLIC CHOICE PERSPECTIVE Beth Z. Shaw ABSTRACT This article evaluates whether specialized juries are better in dealing

DocID: 1sdJq - View Document

feature article Representative Juries: Examining the Initial and Eligible Pools of Juries by Elizabeth Neeley, Ph.D.

DocID: 1rRtx - View Document