Exaction - PDFSEARCH.IO - Document Search Engine

Exaction
Results: 57

#	Item
31	CONFUSING REGULATORY TAKINGS WITH REGULATORY EXACTIONS: THE SUPREME COURT GETS LOST IN THE SWAMP OF KOONTZ ISRAEL PIEDRA * Abstract: In 2013, the Supreme Court concluded that monetary exactions must Add to Reading List Source URL: ealr.bclawreview.org Language: English - Date: 2014-04-15 14:20:11 Case law Regulatory taking Nollan v. California Coastal Commission Lingle v. Chevron Dolan v. City of Tigard California Coastal Commission Dean Koontz Eminent domain Easement Law Real property law Exaction
32	Filed[removed]IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA STERLING PARK, L.P., et al., Add to Reading List Source URL: www.courts.ca.gov Language: English - Date: 2013-10-17 12:49:08 Impact fee Exaction Real property law Fee
33	Is this email not displaying correctly? Try the web version. July[removed] Add to Reading List Source URL: nsglc.olemiss.edu Language: English - Date: 2014-08-22 10:15:15 Nollan v. California Coastal Commission Law Supreme Court of the United States California Coastal Commission Case law Regulatory taking Exaction Real property law New Hampshire Supreme Court
34	Chapter 8 – Development Exactions and Impacts Fees CHAPTER 8 - INDEX 8-10: ROAD IMPACT FEES .......................................................................................... [removed]: PURPOSE ............... Add to Reading List Source URL: www.aspenpitkin.com Language: English - Date: 2014-07-29 14:00:53 Impact fee Exaction Real property law Fee
35	EXACTING PUBLIC BEACH ACCESS: THE VIABILITY OF PERMIT CONDITIONS AND FLORIDA’S STATE BEACH ACCESS LAWS AFTER DOLAN V. CITY OF TIGARD SHAWN M. WILLSON* Table of Contents Add to Reading List Source URL: www.law.fsu.edu Language: English - Date: 2000-09-25 17:44:27 Land law Property law Nollan v. California Coastal Commission Regulatory taking California Coastal Commission Dolan v. City of Tigard Easement Coastal management Texas Open Beaches Act Real property law Law Exaction
36	RIPENESS AND FORUM SELECTION IN FIFTH AMENDMENT TAKINGS LITIGATION* THOMAS E. ROBERTS I. A MESSAGE UNHEARD, MISUNDERSTOOD, OR RESISTED The 1985 decision in Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Ban Add to Reading List Source URL: www.law.fsu.edu Language: English - Date: 1999-07-08 13:39:21** Inverse condemnation Exaction Public use Agins v. City of Tiburon Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution Dolan v. City of Tigard Eminent domain Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council United States v. Causby Law Case law Regulatory taking
37	Microsoft Word[removed]doc Add to Reading List Source URL: www.foreffectivegov.org Language: English - Date: 2013-01-22 21:15:03 Property Exaction United States Constitution Government procurement in the United States Regulatory taking Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson City Law Eminent domain Public use
38	ROLLING EASEMENTS AS A RESPONSE TO SEA LEVEL RISE IN COASTAL TEXAS: CURRENT STATUS OF THE LAW AFTER SEVERANCE V. PATTERSON RICHARD J. MCLAUGHLIN* HARTE RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR GULF OF MEXICO STUDIES I. Add to Reading List Source URL: www.law.fsu.edu Language: English - Date: 2011-10-10 15:33:21 Land transport Coastal geography Easement Texas Open Beaches Act Coastal management Regulatory taking Exaction Right-of-way Bulkhead Real property law Transport Physical geography
39	California Coastal Commission Staff Report and Recommendation Regarding Appeal No. A-1-MEN[removed], Substantial Issue Determination (Miller, Mendocino County) Add to Reading List Source URL: documents.coastal.ca.gov Language: English - Date: 2014-03-10 19:03:23 Environment of California Exaction Easement Appeal Real property law Law California Coastal Commission
40	FINANCIAL PLANNING FOR MILLSBORO’S FUTURE Add to Reading List Source URL: www.cabe.com Language: English - Date: 2013-05-03 09:58:09 Millennium Development Goals Aquatic ecology Sewerage Chemistry Chemical engineering Total maximum daily load Exaction Water supply Algal bloom Water Water pollution Environment