<--- Back to Details
First PageDocument Content
Surveillance / Mass surveillance / National Security Agency / Signals intelligence / Espionage / Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act / NSA warrantless surveillance controversy / In re Sealed Case / NSA electronic surveillance program / National security / Privacy of telecommunications / Government
Date: 2014-05-06 14:31:32
Surveillance
Mass surveillance
National Security Agency
Signals intelligence
Espionage
Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act
NSA warrantless surveillance controversy
In re Sealed Case
NSA electronic surveillance program
National security
Privacy of telecommunications
Government

Add to Reading List

Source URL: fas.org

Download Document from Source Website

Share Document on Facebook

Similar Documents

United States courts of appeals / Civil procedure / En banc / Emilio M. Garza / Milan Smith

Appendix E: Divided Criminal Law Cases OP= wrote opinion CP/DP= concurring in part, dissenting in part no notation = joined the majority opinion Case In re Sealed Case, 131

DocID: 1qdeH - View Document

Mass surveillance / Privacy of telecommunications / Espionage / National security / Surveillance / Signals intelligence / Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act / United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court / National Security Agency / Global surveillance / NSA warrantless surveillance / In re Sealed Case No. 02-001

https://www.justsecurity.orgcult-rules-origins-intellige

DocID: 1o6lU - View Document

Privacy of telecommunications / National security / Espionage / Law / Mass surveillance / Signals intelligence / 110th United States Congress / National Security Agency / Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act / United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court / In re Sealed Case No. 02-001 / Patriot Act

U.S.C. § 1881a (“Section 1881a”). 2 FISA provides a formalized structure for U.S. law enforcement agencies to obtain information about persons suspected of international terrorism or espionage against the United Sta

DocID: 1ltgQ - View Document

Attorney-Client Privilege The following is derived from In re Sealed Case, 737 F.2d 94, 98–99 (D.C. Cirquoting U.S. v. United Shoe Machinery Corp., 89 F. Supp. 357, 358–59 (D. MassThis flowchart do

DocID: 1epor - View Document

Mass surveillance / Privacy law / Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act / Signals intelligence / Privacy / In re Sealed Case / Patriot Act / Privacy of telecommunications / National security / Law

Case 1:13-cvKBJ Document 25 FiledPage 1 of 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA __________________________________________ )

DocID: 18It6 - View Document