A DISTINCTION WITHOUT A DIFFERENCE

First Page		Document Content
Date: 2013-01-02 23:13:53 Case law Qualified domestic relations order Defined benefit pension plan Will Boggs v. Boggs Mertens v. Hewitt Associates ERISA reimbursement Employee Retirement Income Security Act Law Egelhoff v. Egelhoff		A DISTINCTION WITHOUT A DIFFERENCE Add to Reading List Source URL: bclawreview.org Download Document from Source Website File Size: 253,70 KB Share Document on Facebook

	CLIENT ALERT May 2, 2013 ARE YOUR MEDICAL PLAN SUBROGATION PROVISIONS UP TO DATE? In McCutchen v. U.S. Airways, the Supreme Court confirmed that, if an ERISA medical plan’s provisions are unambiguous, a court will not DocID: 1gge1 - View Document
	Only the Westlaw citation is currently available DocID: 15tMU - View Document
	Insurance Practice Group – Life, Health & Disability Sub-Group This Edition’s Contributors: Gillian Dale, Esq. Cristin J. Mack, Esq. HALL & EVANS, LLC \| DocID: 11IUN - View Document
	Chapter 4 Section Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care[removed]Recovery of Health Costs DocID: 11dp8 - View Document
	MASSACHUSETTS ACADEMY OF TRIAL ATTORNEYS 2 FEBRUARY 2010 DocID: Wqjv - View Document