<--- Back to Details
First PageDocument Content
Redevelopment / Urban decay / Urban studies and planning / Tax increment financing / Political economy / California Proposition 13 / California State Controller / Eminent domain / Internal Revenue Service / Public finance / Public economics / Property taxes
Date: 2012-02-06 21:11:49
Redevelopment
Urban decay
Urban studies and planning
Tax increment financing
Political economy
California Proposition 13
California State Controller
Eminent domain
Internal Revenue Service
Public finance
Public economics
Property taxes

Microsoft Word - Issues with ABX1 26-DRAFT[removed]docx

Add to Reading List

Source URL: californiacityfinance.com

Download Document from Source Website

File Size: 877,12 KB

Share Document on Facebook

Similar Documents

CIVIL PROCEDURE SUBCHAPTER G EMINENT DOMAIN SectionWho May Exercise Authority

DocID: 1uFrD - View Document

Dealing with Eminent Domain Carl Kitchensy Alex Roomets University of Mississippi

DocID: 1tMEq - View Document

The Use of Eminent Domain in Land Assembly: The Case of the Tennessee Valley Authority by Carl Kitchens 1 Abstract On the heels of the Kelo vs. New London court decision, there has been a renewed interest in

DocID: 1tIKJ - View Document

Gail B. Litz v. Maryland Department of the Environment, et al., No. 23, September Term, 2015. Opinion by Harrell, J. EMINENT DOMAIN – INVERSE CONDEMNATION “Inverse condemnation” is a shorthand description of an act

DocID: 1t7sg - View Document

Microsoft Word - Article, Nebraska Municipal Review, Eminent Domain.docx

DocID: 1swmO - View Document