<--- Back to Details
First PageDocument Content
Linear regression / Regression analysis / Constructible universe / Differences between codices Sinaiticus and Vaticanus / Statistics / Econometrics / Estimation theory
Date: 2008-09-21 11:57:10
Linear regression
Regression analysis
Constructible universe
Differences between codices Sinaiticus and Vaticanus
Statistics
Econometrics
Estimation theory

Add to Reading List

Source URL: www-stat.wharton.upenn.edu

Download Document from Source Website

File Size: 200,61 KB

Share Document on Facebook

Similar Documents

New Testament / Textual variants in the Gospel of Matthew / Differences between codices Sinaiticus and Vaticanus / Symbol / Bible / Complex analysis

Remarks on Igusa Theory and Real Orbital Integrals* The study of orbital integrals on p-adic groups has turned out to be singularly difficult, and even the most basic results in the simplest examples are surprisingly ha

DocID: 196Ar - View Document

Textual variants in the Gospel of Matthew / Differences between codices Sinaiticus and Vaticanus / Bible / Biblical criticism / Gospel of Matthew

DOCX Document

DocID: 194ZA - View Document

Decision theory / Loss function / Statistical theory / Estimation theory / Biblical criticism / Symbol / Differences between codices Sinaiticus and Vaticanus / Statistics / Econometrics / Bible

Optimizing F-Measures: A Tale of Two Approaches Nan Ye Department of Computer Science, National University of Singapore, SingaporeKian Ming A. Chai

DocID: 18FcD - View Document

Differences between codices Sinaiticus and Vaticanus

1 Proof of Theorem 1 Theorem 1. Suppose K + 1 distributions pk are linearly spaced along a path γ. Assuming perfect transitions, if θ(β) and the Fisher information matrix Gθ (β) = covx∼pθ (∇θ log pθ (x)) are

DocID: 17VaQ - View Document

Differences between codices Sinaiticus and Vaticanus / Bible / Biblical criticism / Symbol

1.1) One may use any reasonable equation to obtain the dimension of the questioned quantities. I) The Planck relation is hν = E ⇒ [h][ν ] = [ E ] ⇒ [h] = [ E ][ν ]−1 = ML2T −II) [c] = LT −1 (0.2)

DocID: 13wel - View Document