<--- Back to Details
First PageDocument Content
Logic / N400 / Scalar implicature / Difference due to Memory / Semantic memory / Event-related potential / Truth / Entailment / Communication / Electroencephalography / Evoked potentials / Neuroscience
Date: 2012-05-03 12:25:13
Logic
N400
Scalar implicature
Difference due to Memory
Semantic memory
Event-related potential
Truth
Entailment
Communication
Electroencephalography
Evoked potentials
Neuroscience

Add to Reading List

Source URL: www.martinos.org

Download Document from Source Website

File Size: 904,69 KB

Share Document on Facebook

Similar Documents

Word surprisal predicts N400 amplitude during reading

DocID: 1s67H - View Document

Neuroscience / Electroencephalography / Evoked potentials / Nervous system / N400 / Cloze test / P200 / Neurolinguistics / Event-related potential / N100 / Noun / Sentence processing

Journal of Neurolinguistics42e54 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Neurolinguistics journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/

DocID: 1q9YB - View Document

Electroencephalography / Evoked potentials / Neuroscience / Neurolinguistics / Nervous system / Human communication / Linguistics / Speech and language pathology / Speech disfluency / N400 / P600 / P300

Introduction Corpus Fillers Repairs Conclusions Disfluency To ‘er’ is human

DocID: 1pPw5 - View Document

Semantics / Neurolinguistics / Psycholinguistics / Comprehension of idioms / Idioms / N400 / Semantic processing / Literal translation / Literal and figurative language / Sentence processing / Language

Context-dependent Semantic Processing in the Human Brain: Evidence from Idiom Comprehension Joost Rommers1, Ton Dijkstra2, and Marcel Bastiaansen1,2 Abstract ■ Language comprehension involves activating word meanings

DocID: 1pD6K - View Document

Neurolinguistics / Psycholinguistics / Electroencephalography / Evoked potentials / N400 / Sentence processing / Prediction in language comprehension / Cloze test / Sentence

Alpha and theta band dynamics related to sentential constraint and word expectancy Joost Rommers1,2, Danielle S. Dickson1, James J. S. Norton2,3, Edward W. Wlotko4, Kara D. Federmeier1,2,3 1

DocID: 1py14 - View Document