<--- Back to Details
First PageDocument Content
Design of experiments / Clinical research / Systematic review / Evaluation methods / Scientific method / Randomized controlled trial / Selection bias / Meta-analysis / Publication bias / Science / Knowledge / Statistics
Date: 2014-10-17 02:44:21
Design of experiments
Clinical research
Systematic review
Evaluation methods
Scientific method
Randomized controlled trial
Selection bias
Meta-analysis
Publication bias
Science
Knowledge
Statistics

An upper limit for macromolecular crowding effects

Add to Reading List

Source URL: www1.cifor.org

Download Document from Source Website

File Size: 261,51 KB

Share Document on Facebook

Similar Documents

The Perils of P-Hacking and the Promise of Pre-Analysis Plans Synopsis One response to the problems of publication bias and data dredging (or ‘p-hacking’) in the medical and social sciences is to demand that research

DocID: 1urdF - View Document

FEATURE ARTICLE RESEARCH Publication bias and the canonization of false facts

DocID: 1tr7j - View Document

Does Registration Reduce Publication Bias? No Evidence from Medical Sciences∗ July 14, 2015 Abstract

DocID: 1scnO - View Document

Summarising the evidence from animal models of neurological disease: Publication bias, poor internal validity, and (perhaps) some efficacy

DocID: 1rMFV - View Document

Study Quality and Publication Bias in Experimental Stroke CAMARADES: Bringing evidence to translational medicine Presenter Disclosure

DocID: 1rEgG - View Document