<--- Back to Details
First PageDocument Content
Academia / Retraction / Publication bias / Scientific misconduct / Impact factor / Scientific journal / Peer review / Scientific method / Meta-analysis / Science / Knowledge / Academic publishing
Date: 2013-05-12 20:01:35
Academia
Retraction
Publication bias
Scientific misconduct
Impact factor
Scientific journal
Peer review
Scientific method
Meta-analysis
Science
Knowledge
Academic publishing

Running Head: Consequences of Journal Rank Deep Impact: Unintended

Add to Reading List

Source URL: arxiv.org

Download Document from Source Website

File Size: 493,23 KB

Share Document on Facebook

Similar Documents

PROCEDURES FOR RESPONDING TO ALLEGATIONS OF SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT Office of Academic Grants and Sponsored Research Developed February 2004 Revised January 2010

DocID: 1uNQQ - View Document

CAMPUS CLIMATE SURVEY ON SEXUAL ASSAULT AND SEXUAL MISCONDUCT Frequently Asked Questions What is the purpose of the survey? The survey is a scientific initiative to help universities better understand the attitudes and e

DocID: 1uDaC - View Document

Scientific Misconduct & Research Integrity Historical Background, Current Global Challenges and Initiatives Nicholas H. Steneck, PhD University of Michigan First Brazilian Meeting on Research

DocID: 1sJW9 - View Document

Scientific Misconduct & Research Integrity Historical Background, Current Global Challenges and Initiatives Nicholas H. Steneck, PhD University of Michigan

DocID: 1sb6M - View Document

Academia / Academic publishing / Publishing / Public sphere / Misconduct / Scientific misconduct / Plagiarism / Theft / Mkwawa University College of Education / BioRxiv / Manuscript / Preprint

AUTHOR GUIDELINES FOR MKWAWA JOURNAL

DocID: 1ru1F - View Document