<--- Back to Details
First PageDocument Content
Science / Knowledge / Credentialing / Peer review / Academia / Credential / Peer-to-peer / Academic literature / Academic publishing / Scientific method
Date: 2014-11-17 20:21:51
Science
Knowledge
Credentialing
Peer review
Academia
Credential
Peer-to-peer
Academic literature
Academic publishing
Scientific method

Microsoft Word - Becoming a Peer Reviewer 2012

Add to Reading List

Source URL: www.acmhn.org

Download Document from Source Website

File Size: 69,97 KB

Share Document on Facebook

Similar Documents

PHARMACY CREDENTIALING / RE-CREDENTIALING Dear Pharmacy Providers PharmPix requires each provider to meet the participation requirements, including but not limited to, licensure, insurance and provider agreement require

DocID: 1v9YW - View Document

PHARMACY CREDENTIALING FORM Pharmacies The following is a list of Provider’s Pharmacies covered by this Agreement (if a location is not listed, then such location is not contracted to participate and will not receive r

DocID: 1uWo3 - View Document

Dear ECVN/ESVN member, Due to EBVS recommendations/rules, some changes were made to enhance the credentialing process (the new guidelines are updated in our website, please read them carefully). There are important chang

DocID: 1uKZY - View Document

THE APPROVED CLINICAL SUPERVISOR (ACS) CODE OF ETHICS In addition to following the Code of Ethics of the applicable mental health credentialing body, an Approved Clinical Supervisor shall: 1.

DocID: 1uCvA - View Document

www.ProExam.org Research and Advisory Services Proven Guidance to Establish and Enhance Organizations and institutions face myriad questions when creating or evaluating a credentialing program. How does a credential fit

DocID: 1uyHm - View Document