<--- Back to Details
First PageDocument Content
Group theory / Quasiconvex function / Normal subgroup / Hyperbolic group / Index of a subgroup / Double coset / Representation theory of finite groups / Boundedly generated group / Abstract algebra / Mathematics / Algebra
Date: 2005-12-14 05:35:02
Group theory
Quasiconvex function
Normal subgroup
Hyperbolic group
Index of a subgroup
Double coset
Representation theory of finite groups
Boundedly generated group
Abstract algebra
Mathematics
Algebra

SOME PROPERTIES OF SUBSETS OF HYPERBOLIC GROUPS Ashot Minasyan Department of Mathematics Vanderbilt University Nashville, TN 37240, USA

Add to Reading List

Source URL: www.personal.soton.ac.uk

Download Document from Source Website

File Size: 272,38 KB

Share Document on Facebook

Similar Documents

A Course in Finite Group Representation Theory Peter Webb February 23, 2016 Preface The representation theory of finite groups has a long history, going back to the 19th

A Course in Finite Group Representation Theory Peter Webb February 23, 2016 Preface The representation theory of finite groups has a long history, going back to the 19th

DocID: 1r8MU - View Document

Microsoft Word - fall 10 Newsletter draft.doc

Microsoft Word - fall 10 Newsletter draft.doc

DocID: 1qUkh - View Document

Model theory of finite and pseudofinite groups Dugald Macpherson∗, School of Mathematics, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK,

Model theory of finite and pseudofinite groups Dugald Macpherson∗, School of Mathematics, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK,

DocID: 1qU5n - View Document

445  Documenta Math. Some Consequences of the Karpenko-Merkurjev Theorem

445 Documenta Math. Some Consequences of the Karpenko-Merkurjev Theorem

DocID: 1qdcD - View Document

ERRATA FOR “CANONICAL SUBGROUPS VIA BREUIL-KISIN MODULES” SHIN HATTORI The proof of [1, Propositionis incorrect. In page 950 line 1–2, the author claims that the assertion (2) of the proposition is deduce

ERRATA FOR “CANONICAL SUBGROUPS VIA BREUIL-KISIN MODULES” SHIN HATTORI The proof of [1, Propositionis incorrect. In page 950 line 1–2, the author claims that the assertion (2) of the proposition is deduce

DocID: 1qcQX - View Document