<--- Back to Details
First PageDocument Content
Science / Retraction / BMJ / Committee on Publication Ethics / Richard Smith / John Darsee / Hwang Woo-suk / Whistleblower / Andrew Wakefield / Scientific misconduct / Knowledge / Academia
Science
Retraction
BMJ
Committee on Publication Ethics
Richard Smith
John Darsee
Hwang Woo-suk
Whistleblower
Andrew Wakefield
Scientific misconduct
Knowledge
Academia

Add to Reading List

Source URL: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Download Document from Source Website

File Size: 73,84 KB

Share Document on Facebook

Similar Documents

PROCEDURES FOR RESPONDING TO ALLEGATIONS OF SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT Office of Academic Grants and Sponsored Research Developed February 2004 Revised January 2010

DocID: 1uNQQ - View Document

CAMPUS CLIMATE SURVEY ON SEXUAL ASSAULT AND SEXUAL MISCONDUCT Frequently Asked Questions What is the purpose of the survey? The survey is a scientific initiative to help universities better understand the attitudes and e

DocID: 1uDaC - View Document

Scientific Misconduct & Research Integrity Historical Background, Current Global Challenges and Initiatives Nicholas H. Steneck, PhD University of Michigan First Brazilian Meeting on Research

DocID: 1sJW9 - View Document

Scientific Misconduct & Research Integrity Historical Background, Current Global Challenges and Initiatives Nicholas H. Steneck, PhD University of Michigan

DocID: 1sb6M - View Document

Academia / Academic publishing / Publishing / Public sphere / Misconduct / Scientific misconduct / Plagiarism / Theft / Mkwawa University College of Education / BioRxiv / Manuscript / Preprint

AUTHOR GUIDELINES FOR MKWAWA JOURNAL

DocID: 1ru1F - View Document