First Page | Document Content | |
---|---|---|
![]() Design of experiments Evaluation methods Pharmacology Medical statistics Scientific method Placebo-controlled study Clinical trial Ivacaftor Interim analysis Science Research Clinical research | Add to Reading List |
![]() | OPEN SUBJECT AREAS: FLUORESCENCE IMAGING DRUG DEVELOPMENT HIGH-THROUGHPUT SCREENINGDocID: 1pyUW - View Document |
![]() | Pulmonary-Allergy Drugs Advisory Committee Meeting Lumacaftor/Ivacaftor Tablets for oral use NDAFDA Opening Remarks and Regulatory HistoryDocID: 1eMZq - View Document |
![]() | FDA Advisory Committee Briefing Materials ORKAMBI™ (Lumacaftor/Ivacaftor) for CF Page 1 of 98 Sponsor Briefing DocumentDocID: 1dX4Q - View Document |
![]() | 11. On page 120, the 3rd sentence in Section 2.5 should read “In my opinion, it would be a bad idea to conclude that ivacaftor was similar to placebo and even worse to conclude that LUM/IVA was better than placebo ivDocID: 1aHHB - View Document |
![]() | PDF DocumentDocID: 17l0S - View Document |