<--- Back to Details
First PageDocument Content
Case or Controversy Clause / Avegno v. Schmidt / Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley Authority / Civil procedure / Law / Mootness
Date: 2009-12-14 11:50:34
Case or Controversy Clause
Avegno v. Schmidt
Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley Authority
Civil procedure
Law
Mootness

[removed]Alvarez v. Smith[removed])

Add to Reading List

Source URL: www.supremecourt.gov

Download Document from Source Website

File Size: 137,20 KB

Share Document on Facebook

Similar Documents

Standing / Law / Spokeo / Case or Controversy Clause / Lawsuit / Damages / Plaintiff / Tort / Civil law common law) / Civil procedure / Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley Authority / Massachusetts v. Mellon

A Summary of Standing Doctrine Paul Gowder A person must have standing in order to bring suit in federal court. Standing doctrine is composed of two types of rules. First, there are constitutional rules, derived from Art

DocID: 1r3P3 - View Document

Law / Civil law / Class action / Standing / Elk Grove Unified School District v. Newdow / Case or Controversy Clause / Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife

Microsoft Word - 3222284_5.doc

DocID: 1qCWN - View Document

United States Constitution / Law / United States constitutional law / Veto / Federalism in the United States / Judicial branch of the United States government / Article Three of the United States Constitution / Article One of the United States Constitution / Commerce Clause / Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Chadha / Clinton v. City of New York / Case or Controversy Clause

LAW 200 Spring 2010 Constitutional Law Outline Professor Joondeph CONSTITUTIONAL LAW OVERVIEW Checklist

DocID: 1pOCg - View Document

Climate change policy in the United States / United States Environmental Protection Agency / Standing / Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife / Case or Controversy Clause / Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection Agency / Parens patriae / Defense of Marriage Act / Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley Authority / United States v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures

Lujan Facts: Plaintiffs, several private citizens, sue Secretary of the Interior, who interpreted Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to apply to only the United States. Plaintiffs claim that they will experi

DocID: 1pLkE - View Document

Law / Appellate review / Civil procedure / Mootness / Case or Controversy Clause / Arizonans for Official English v. Arizona / Supreme Court of the United States / Certiorari / Vacated judgment / Judgment / Appellate jurisdiction

NoIN THE Supreme Court of the United States ________________

DocID: 1lg0R - View Document