Do Not Delete[removed]:02 PM ADDRESS THE RELEVANCE OF OFFENDER

First Page		Document Content
Date: 2014-04-25 19:34:46 United States Federal Sentencing Guidelines United States federal law United States v. Booker Kimbrough v. United States Blakely v. Washington Marvin E. Frankel Gall v. United States Mandatory sentencing United States Sentencing Commission United States criminal procedure Law Criminal procedure		Do Not Delete[removed]:02 PM ADDRESS THE RELEVANCE OF OFFENDER Add to Reading List Source URL: www.houstonlawreview.org Download Document from Source Website File Size: 206,39 KB Share Document on Facebook

	March 11, 2004 United States Sentencing Commission One Columbus Circle, NE SuiteWashington, DCAttn: Public Affairs DocID: 1uPwr - View Document
	The Effects of Aging on Recidivism Among Federal Offenders U N I T E D S TAT E S S E N T E NC I NG COM M I S S ION United States Sentencing Commission One Columbus Circle, N.E. DocID: 1uOKR - View Document
	RETURNING TO MARVIN FRANKEL’S FIRST PRINCIPLES IN FEDERAL SENTENCING Thirty years ago last month, the newly-formed United States Sentencing Commission circulated the first “discussion draft” of proposed federal sen DocID: 1tBZm - View Document
	Remarks of Chief Judge Patti B. Saris, Chair of the United States Sentencing Commission December Public Meeting December 9, 2016 Thank you for attending this public meeting of the United States Sentencing DocID: 1t4AR - View Document
	ESTIMATED IMPACT OF SENTENCING REFORMS: Sentencing Reform and Corrections Act, Svs. Smarter Sentencing Act, S. 502 Mandatory Minimum Changes Sentence DocID: 1rtFy - View Document