<--- Back to Details
| First Page | Document Content | |
|---|---|---|
 Date: 2010-09-22 12:13:05Juries Blakely v. Washington Apprendi v. New Jersey United States v. Booker Cunningham v. California United States Federal Sentencing Guidelines Mandatory sentencing Rita v. United States Ring v. Arizona Law Case law United States criminal procedure |
Add to Reading List |
Microsoft Word - BermanBibasPre-PDF.rtf | Microsoft Word - Responses_Blakely v Washington.docDocID: 1uTN7 - View Document |
| RETHINKING PARENTAL INCARCERATION SARAH ABRAMOWICZ * Recent changes in sentencing law, in the wake of cases interpreting Blakely v. Washington and United States v. Booker, have raised the possibility that courts sentenciDocID: 1u8YR - View Document |
| DEMOGRAPHIC IMPACT STATEMENTS, O’CONNOR’S WARNING, AND THE MYSTERIES OF PRISON RELEASE: TOPICS FROM A SENTENCING REFORM AGENDA Kevin R. Reitz∗ I.DocID: 1aJGU - View Document |
| PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ No_____________DocID: 19veD - View Document |
| The Feeney Pit and the Pendulum: Swings in Criminalizing Securities LawsDocID: 141Ic - View Document |