First Page | Document Content | |
---|---|---|
![]() Date: 2010-09-22 12:13:05Juries Blakely v. Washington Apprendi v. New Jersey United States v. Booker Cunningham v. California United States Federal Sentencing Guidelines Mandatory sentencing Rita v. United States Ring v. Arizona Law Case law United States criminal procedure | Add to Reading List |
![]() | RETHINKING PARENTAL INCARCERATION SARAH ABRAMOWICZ * Recent changes in sentencing law, in the wake of cases interpreting Blakely v. Washington and United States v. Booker, have raised the possibility that courts sentenciDocID: 1u8YR - View Document |
![]() | Case: Document: Page: 1DocID: 1pL6K - View Document |
![]() | JanuarySentencing Guidelines Frequently Asked Questions & Answers Q. It appears criminal history scores will be reduced under the new guidelines. Why? A. The presenting offense is arguably as important as theDocID: 1os0A - View Document |
![]() | Microsoft Word - FS Brief History of Crack LawsNWDocID: 1my60 - View Document |
![]() | FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit April 30, 2009 PUBLISHDocID: 1ll9b - View Document |