<--- Back to Details
First PageDocument Content
Case law / Apprendi v. New Jersey / United States Federal Sentencing Guidelines / Jury trial / Antonin Scalia / Sentence / Blakely v. Washington / Ring v. Arizona / Law / Government / Juries
Date: 2008-06-24 00:24:30
Case law
Apprendi v. New Jersey
United States Federal Sentencing Guidelines
Jury trial
Antonin Scalia
Sentence
Blakely v. Washington
Ring v. Arizona
Law
Government
Juries

02-1632rev.PDF Oral Argument Transcript

Add to Reading List

Source URL: www.supremecourt.gov

Download Document from Source Website

File Size: 209,40 KB

Share Document on Facebook

Similar Documents

Microsoft Word - Responses_Blakely v Washington.doc

DocID: 1uTN7 - View Document

RETHINKING PARENTAL INCARCERATION SARAH ABRAMOWICZ * Recent changes in sentencing law, in the wake of cases interpreting Blakely v. Washington and United States v. Booker, have raised the possibility that courts sentenci

DocID: 1u8YR - View Document

United States Federal Sentencing Guidelines / United States federal law / United States v. Booker / Blakely v. Washington / American Law Institute / Sentencing Reform Act / Kansas Sentencing Commission / Andrew von Hirsch / United States Sentencing Commission / United States criminal procedure / Law / Criminal procedure

DEMOGRAPHIC IMPACT STATEMENTS, O’CONNOR’S WARNING, AND THE MYSTERIES OF PRISON RELEASE: TOPICS FROM A SENTENCING REFORM AGENDA Kevin R. Reitz∗ I.

DocID: 1aJGU - View Document

Gall v. United States / Blakely v. Washington / Plea bargain / Apprendi v. New Jersey / Acceptance of responsibility / Sentence / Conspiracy / Appeal / Presentence investigation report / Law / United States Federal Sentencing Guidelines / United States federal law

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ No_____________

DocID: 19veD - View Document

Criminal law / United States Federal Sentencing Guidelines / United States federal law / Prosecutor / Blakely v. Washington / Public defender / Sarbanes–Oxley Act / United States v. Booker / Mandatory sentencing / Law / Government / Criminal procedure

The Feeney Pit and the Pendulum: Swings in Criminalizing Securities Laws

DocID: 141Ic - View Document