York / Strasbourg / Durkheim / new York / Berlin / Beijing / Calcutta / /
Company
Donnelly / /
Continent
America / Asia / Europe / /
Country
Bangladesh / Japan / Russia / Pakistan / United States / Nigeria / United Kingdom / China / India / /
Event
Reorganization / /
Facility
International Institute of Human Rights / Warwick University / University of Mount Union / University of Wisconsin / University of Richmond / /
IndustryTerm
value-systems / social tool / contradictory cultural belief systems / public services / positive law / real estate agents / rational solutions / /
Organization
International Institute of Human Rights / University of Richmond / New Delhi government / Mount Union / NGOs / Warwick University / European Union / University of Wisconsin / Socialists / /
Person
Thomas Nagel / Homi Bhabha / Fared Zakaria / Aziz al-Hibri / Henry David Thoreau / Bernard Williams / Nussbaum / Binayaka Sen / Deborah Limstadt / Countervailing Power Judged / Fabian Indian / Karl Mannheim / John Kenneth Galbraith / William Corbett / Robin A Naylor / Joseph Raz / Akbar / Amina Lawal / Max Weber / Franz Fanon / Karel Vasak / Jean-Paul Sartre / /
Position
fixed model / canonical model / Emperor / king / model / professor / small farmer / Reporter / /
Forum on Public Policy Human Rights Debate: An Examination of Amartya Sen’s Countervailing Power: Public Reasoning as a Social Instrument Santosh C. Saha, University of Mount Union; Ohio Abstract