Affirmed - PDFSEARCH.IO - Document Search Engine

Affirmed
Results: 322

#	Item
81	On September 21, 2005, the Federal Circuit vacated-in-part, reversed-in-part, affirmed-in-part, and remanded the district court’s injunction from a jury verdict that Ventana infringed U.S. Patents No. 6,180,061 and No. Add to Reading List Source URL: www.law.umaryland.edu Language: English - Date: 2005-10-10 20:31:40 United States patent law Claim Law Government Juries Patent law Markman hearing
82	On October 18, 2005, the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court’s dismissal of Sicom’s complaint for lack of standing to sue for infringement of U.S. Patent No. 5,333,147, which related to a digital signal trans Add to Reading List Source URL: www.law.umaryland.edu Language: English - Date: 2005-12-07 07:28:34 Patent infringement Patent Assignment United States patent law Claim Law Civil law Patent law
83	On April 8, 2005, the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court’s judgment after a bench trial that U.S. Patent No. 4,721,723, which related to paroxetine hydrochloride anhydrate, is invalid as anticipated under 35 U Add to Reading List Source URL: www.law.umaryland.edu Language: English - Date: 2005-05-05 15:17:16 Property law Doctrine of inherency Prior art Sufficiency of disclosure Novelty Patent Person having ordinary skill in the art United States patent law Claim Patent law Law Civil law
84	On April 11, 2005, the Federal Circuit affirmed-in-part, reversed-in-part and remanded the district court’s summary judgment that PPG did not infringe U.S. Patent No. 6,013,234, which relates to certain essentially sph Add to Reading List Source URL: www.law.umaryland.edu Language: English - Date: 2005-05-05 15:17:20 Rhodia Claim Patent Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co. Patent law Doctrine of equivalents Law
85	On March 15, 2005, the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court’s summary judgment that Benetton did not infringe U.S. Patents No. 5,803,466 and No. 6,045,143, which related to in-line roller skates. The Federal Cir Add to Reading List Source URL: www.law.umaryland.edu Language: English - Date: 2005-03-30 13:26:11 Claim Person having ordinary skill in the art Patent Patent law Law Doctrine of equivalents
86	On June 7, 2005, the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court’s judgment that U.S. Patents No. 5,656,295, No. 5,508,042, and No. 5,549,912, which related to controlled release oxycodone formulations, were unenforcea Add to Reading List Source URL: www.law.umaryland.edu Language: English - Date: 2005-07-01 10:06:30 Morphinans Tippecanoe County Indiana Alcohols Euphoriants Oxycodone West Lafayette Indiana Inequitable conduct Purdue University Purdue Pharma Chemistry Organic chemistry Ketones
87	On March 16, 2005, the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court’s summary judgment that Genus did not infringe U.S. Patents No. 6,015,590, and No. 5,916,365, which relate to sequential atomic layer deposition (ALD) Add to Reading List Source URL: www.law.umaryland.edu Language: English - Date: 2005-03-30 13:27:22 Vacuum Claim Physics Dimension Mechanical engineering Pumps Vacuum pump Inert gas
88	On October 5, 2005, the Federal Circuit affirmed-in-part and vacated-in-part the district court’s judgment after a bench trial that U.S. Patent No. 5,633,352, which related to recombinant human growth hormone, was inva Add to Reading List Source URL: www.law.umaryland.edu Language: English - Date: 2005-10-10 20:30:10 Inequitable conduct United States law Intellectual property law Misrepresentation Novo Nordisk Patent United States patent law Law Ethics
89	On August 5, 2005, the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court’s summary judgment that U.S. Patent No. 6,014,137, which related to an electronic kiosk authoring system, was invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 112, ¶ 2. The Add to Reading List Source URL: www.law.umaryland.edu Language: English - Date: 2005-08-05 21:34:00 Patent Law Government Patent law Claim Intellectual property law
90	On July 13, 2005, the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court’s judgment that Microsoft infringed U.S. Reissue Patent No. 32,580 under 35 U.S.C. § 271(f) for copies of the Windows® operating system that had been Add to Reading List Source URL: www.law.umaryland.edu Language: English - Date: 2005-08-05 21:32:26 Dow Jones Industrial Average Microsoft Economy of the United States

UPDATE