Affirmed - PDFSEARCH.IO - Document Search Engine

Affirmed
Results: 322

#	Item
101	th FINAL VERSION AFFIRMED 7 December Ministerial Commitment on comprehensive sexuality education and sexual and reproductive health services for adolescents and young people in Add to Reading List Source URL: youngpeopletoday.net Language: English - Date: 2014-12-15 23:22:26 Human behavior Sex education Reproductive health Sexual intercourse Demographic and Health Surveys Teenage pregnancy Family Planning Association India German Foundation for World Population Human sexuality Health Adolescence
102	On June 14, 2005, the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court’s judgment that Advanta’s Soybean Purchase Agreements violated the misbranding provision of the Plant Variety Protection Act (PVPA), 7 U.S.C. § 2568. Add to Reading List Source URL: www.law.umaryland.edu Language: English - Date: 2005-07-01 10:06:51 Legal aspects of computing Law Agronomy Plant Variety Protection Act First-sale doctrine
103	On April 22, 2005, the Federal Circuit affirmed the portion of the district court’s summary judgment that held Microsoft did not infringe U.S. Patent No. 5,799,151, which related to an interactive electronic trade netw Add to Reading List Source URL: www.law.umaryland.edu Language: English - Date: 2005-05-05 15:17:14 Property law Claim United States patent law Doctrine of equivalents Patentability Patent law Civil law Law
104	On January 6, 2005, the Federal Circuit affirmed-in-part, vacated-in-part, and remanded the district court’s summary judgment that MicroStrategy did not infringe claims 1, 2 and 4 of U.S. Patent No. 5,555,403, which re Add to Reading List Source URL: www.law.umaryland.edu Language: English - Date: 2005-01-07 14:35:43 Query languages Prosecution history estoppel Law Relational database management systems Doctrine of equivalents Database management systems Online analytical processing SQL MicroStrategy Patent law Data management Computing
105	On August 10, 2005, the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court’s judgment that U.S. Patent No. 5,422,368, but not related U.S. Patent No. 5,296,504, which both related to a glaucoma drug marketed as Xalatan®, was Add to Reading List Source URL: www.law.umaryland.edu Language: English - Date: 2005-08-25 11:14:36 Law Property law Ethics Inequitable conduct United States law Prior art Term of patent Patent Claim Patent law United States patent law Civil law
106	On September 8, 2005, the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court’s summary judgment that Microsoft did not infringe U.S. Patent No. 6,073,124, which related to buying software or audio files over a computer networ Add to Reading List Source URL: www.law.umaryland.edu Language: English - Date: 2005-10-10 20:32:52 Motion Discovery Law
107	On May 6, 2005, the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court’s summary judgment that SmartDisk’s adapters for flash memories and smart cards did not infringe U.S. Patent No. 5,224,216, which related to computer pe Add to Reading List Source URL: www.law.umaryland.edu Language: English - Date: 2005-06-07 12:03:13 Claim Patent United States patent law Patent law Law Doctrine of equivalents
108	On December 6, 2005, the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court’s summary judgment that Stryker did not infringe U.S. Patent No. 6,002,065, which related to calcium phosphate compositions used as bone cements in m Add to Reading List Source URL: www.law.umaryland.edu Language: English - Date: 2006-02-01 18:55:44 Phosphate Claim Sodium Salt Chemistry Patent law Organophosphates
109	On September 13, 2005, the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court’s judgment that Grow More did not infringe U.S. Patent No. 5,830,255, which related to phosphorus fertilizer compositions. The Federal Circuit stat Add to Reading List Source URL: www.law.umaryland.edu Language: English - Date: 2005-10-10 20:32:18 Intellectual property law Monopoly Patent Presumption Person having ordinary skill in the art Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co. Prosecution history estoppel Law Patent law Evidence law
110	On March 7, 2005, the Federal Circuit, inter alia, vacated-in-part, affirmed-inpart and remanded the district court’s summary judgment that P&G did not infringe U.S. Patent No. 4,536,178, which related to a tampon appl Add to Reading List Source URL: www.law.umaryland.edu Language: English - Date: 2005-03-30 13:24:12 Flatten Claim Tampon Patent law Computer representation of surfaces Surfaces

UPDATE