Back to Results
First PageMeta Content
Technology / Fitbit / Biology / Actigraphy / False advertising / Sleep / Plaintiff / Lawsuit / ANT / Legal terms / Civil law / Law


Case4:15-cvDMR Document1 Filed05Page1 of
Add to Reading List

Document Date: 2015-05-11 12:35:56


Open Document

File Size: 828,83 KB

Share Result on Facebook

City

San Francisco / /

Company

AT&T / Fitbit Flex / Verizon / FITBIT INC. / Plaintiff Brickman / Defendant Fitbit Inc. / A. Bartela (Ohio Bar No. 0088128) DWORKEN & BERNSTEIN CO. L.P. / RadioShack / /

Currency

USD / /

/

Event

Legal Issues / M&A / Business Partnership / /

Facility

Bar No. / /

IndustryTerm

advertising goods / accepted sleep-monitoring technologies / scientific equipment / large retail stores / similar technology / real time / false advertising / personal fitness-tracking devices / social media pages / base-model device / much less accurate actigraphy-like technology / sleep-tracking devices / sleep-tracking technology / online store / putative class devices / less accurate actigraphy-like technology / consumer fitness devices / accepted technology / less invasive sleep-monitoring technology / wireless-enabled devices / sleep-monitoring technologies / /

Organization

San Francisco Division / California Supreme Court / UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT / Federal Trade Commission / Fitbit Force / LAW OFFICES OF JOHN A. KITHAS One Embarcadero Center / /

Person

JAMES P. BRICKMAN / Plaintiff / Code / Christopher Land / John A. Kithas / /

/

Position

technician / Secretary of State / class representative / representative / /

ProvinceOrState

Delaware / Florida / Hernando / California / /

Technology

actigraphy-like technology / scientifically accepted technology / sleep-tracking technology / sleep-monitoring technologies / less invasive sleep-monitoring technology / accepted sleep-monitoring technologies / /

URL

http /

SocialTag